The Center for Anthropology and Science Communications facilitates improved communication between anthropologists, the public, and science media. Merry Bruns, Director mbruns@nasw.org |
Copyright
1995-2009.CASC. |
"Cracking the Code: Anthropologists and Science Writers"
by Merry Bruns
Scientists, anthropologists, and media have a history of mutual wariness, which is inherant in the differences in their goals and methodologies. Anthropologists' fears about dealing with media stem from their perception that the media will misrepresent their work. The perception is too often that this is due to carelessness on the part of the science writer, and a lack of respect for the scientific material. Yet current research conducted on science writers and scientists reveals that the goals of both are actually more similar than would be imagined - both want to present the science corrrectly and demonstrate why it's important. The points of difference lie in Science writers communicate science to the public, making scientific concepts understandable and relevant to peoples' lives, but it isn't always easy: Their Editors demand stories that appeal to a wide general audience, and are written in easy-to-understand language. Difficult science concepts must be written so that the average person can understand them. Science writers are journalists, and journalists write in "inverted pyramid" style: The conclusion comes first, and the development comes afterwards. The opening sentence ("lead") must be an attention-grabber. Even if a science journalist is writing a long feature story, the goal is to lure the reader with an intriguing lead, promising a story that has interest to the reader. Space constraints can force shorter stories and sacrifice of detail. Quotes must be brief and to the point, and content must often be brutally summarized, leading to science stories that are often too short to offer much detail. Above all, science stories must have a news "hook," news "timeliness," provide "answers" (not questions) about the research, and demonstrate its relevance to readers' lives.
It's important to give anthropologists a chance to discuss these issues with the science writers who make their work available to the general public. Roundtables between anthropologists and science writers, in which both groups get a chance to air their views, can go a long way in lessening the mistrust between these two groups.
Information is based on research being conducted by Merry Bruns into the relationship between science writers and anthropologists.
|Communicating Anthropology| |For Students| |About CASC| Email: Merry Bruns, Director |